Archived Tech-Notes
Published by: Larry Bloomfield & Jim Mendrala
The following are our current e-mail addresses:
E-mail = hdtvguy@garlic.comor
J.Mendrala@ieee.org
We have copied the original Tech-Notes below as it was sent out.
Some of the information may be out of date.
**********************************************
North West Tech Notes
% Larry Bloomfield & Jim Mendrala
521 Forest Grove Dr.
Bend, Oregon 97702
(541) 385-9115
Email = larrybend@aol.com
J_Mendrala@compuserve.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
May 25, 1997
NWTN - 002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Larry Bloomfield
Well it looks like we
got our first edition out ok. We sent out quite a few additional
e-mailings to bring lots of folks up to date who saw us in the CGC
Communicator. Thanks for all the words of encouragement and response.
Jim asked me to add some folks to the list. I hope if you are getting
this and don't know why, you do now. For the first several
issues
I have been advised to
print our mission statement so no one will have any question why we are
doing this. Jim Mendrala and I feel that there is a need to have
an electronic listening post, clearing house or informal source for what's
happening in the wonderful world of DTV, ATV, ATSC and HDTV, etc., etc.,
etc. We do not claim to be experts. Our only claim to fame in this
arena is that Jim goes to just about every horse and pony meeting in Southern
California and I speak to a lot of folks everyday. I have to.
Bend is not the end of the world, but I can see it from here. We
both want to know what's going on and we both do a fairly good job at putting
our thoughts down on paper. With respect to writing this newsletter,
as the saying goes: "It's a job and somebody has to do it."
So here we go.
This effort will be successful
ONLY with the assistance of those who help By contributing information
to us and have the professional desire to keep us all on the cutting edge
of this technology. We will share what we get from you.
As I stated in our first
issue, we are all setting sail on uncharted waters. There is a lot of confusion
out there. Talking about DTV, ATV, ATSC and HDTV, etc., to a fellow
broadcaster is almost like discussing religion you get as many different
versions as there are people you speak with. It will be interesting
to see what develops - so grow with us.
We need you to share your
experiences, knowledge or anything else relating to this area of our industry.
Feel free to e-mail us and we will make every effort to share it with our
fellow broadcasters and anyone else interested.
Who will we send these
issues to? As I've just stated: "Anyone interested."
Just e-mail us your request to be added to the mailing list and it's done!
Feel free to forward this on to your associates, but let them know that
you've done so and it's not directly from us. If we send it to you
and you're not interested, just let us know and we will take you off the
mailing list.
This, very much like the
CGC Communicator, is a work of love. We see a need and we're doing
this solely with the idea of keeping ourselves and our associates informed.
We ask no compensation for our efforts, just the latest information you
may have on what's going on. We will not pass on anything that cannot
be verified or the source cannot be identified. If we inadvertently pass
on erroneous information, we will make every effort to get it corrected
as soon as possible. All this is for obvious reasons.
And now our second issue.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subj: USC/SMPTE
Seminar Notes
From: Jim
Mendrala
The USC/SMPTE Seminar
(5/17/97) was a big success. There were over 250 attendees. Some
of the highlights gleaned from the seminar are as follows:
Morning Session
Joe Flaherty, CBS, said
that the first demo of HDTV was in 1981. It had a 15:9 or 5:3 aspect
ratio. He also said that he believes HDTV will drive the TV set manufacturers.
525 will not capture the market. The consumer is willing to pay >$1,200
for HDTV after seeing a demo, but only $500 more if unseen.
Charles Pantuso, HD Vision,
quoted Shakespeare with "Having is not as pleasurable as wanting."
He said this applies to HDTV equipment. HDTV is viewing angle plus
resolution. Channel numbers will become meaningless with the new
DTV system. Plant wise, HDTV will follow SMPTE 292M with a bit serial
interface of 1.5 Gbps. There are some good web sites for info at
:
www.smpte.org
www.fcc.gov
www.atsc.org.
Tom Holman, TMH and of
THX fame, said that broadcasters should start producing in 3 channels.
Originally broadcasters were 1/0 (where the first number represents the
main channels followed by a "/" and the next number is the surround channels
followed by the sub-woofer channel which is non-directional). Then
the broadcaster went to 2/0. The next step should be 3/0, 3/1, 3/2
then 3/2/0.1 (5.1 channels). Movies are mixed now to Dolby AC3 which
is 5.1 channels. Sound imaging and envelopment is most important.
Imaging comes from the left, center and right loudspeakers and envelopment
comes from the surround loud speakers with the sub-woofer providing the
bottom end. The 5.1 (3/2/0.1) channel sound was adopted by the film
industry in 1987. Room acoustics, loud speaker performance, loud
speaker installation, system alignment and bass management are all critical
to the mixing environment. The sub-woofer uses 120 Hz as the folding
frequency.
There are some other
features regarding sound built into the ATV standard regarding compression.
The receiver, upon viewers discretion, can opt for a compressed audio output
or a non-compressed audio output.
Presently the film industry
uses 85 dB as its full scale. -20 dB FS = 85 dB spl (sound pressure
level). TV is presently about 79 dB full scale. -20 dB FS = 79 dB
spl.
John Hora, ASC, said that
back in the early 1920's a 20 foot wide screen would be filled by a 50
mm taking lens. 50 mm was considered a "normal" lens and the image filled
the aspect ratio, started by Edison, which was 1.33:1 or 4:3 aspect ratio.
Later it was desired to widen the motion picture screen to 40 feet to compete
more favorably with the vaudeville shows on the stage. The problem
in some theaters was that by enlarging the screen the viewers who paid
top dollar for the seats towards the back of the theater could not see
the top of the screen because of the balcony, so the top of the picture
masked off. This led to the start of the wide screen aspect ratios.
This was around the mid 1920's. Since the screens were wider but
not higher, a shorter focal length lens was used to shoot the image because
of the wider viewing angle. This also requires different framing.
You cannot successfully shoot for two different aspect ratios.
The 16:9 or 1.78 aspect
ratio is not as wide as 1.85:1, 2.35:1 or 2.55:1 aspect ratios. Cinerama
had a 146 degree taking angle and was the longest single film run in box
office history. IMAX has a 1.33:1 or 4:3 aspect ratio. Since
the viewer sits closer to the screen his viewing angle is wider, so the
taking lenses take a wider angle of view. Some IMAX screens are 5
stories tall.
Henery Mahler, CBS, said
that he believes that HDTV and 35 mm film on an HDTV display have about
the same resolution. His concern is that if your source material
is Super 16, 16 mm or 525 you will see a great reduction in resolution.
He followed that with a projection of the HDTV, 35 mm, Super 16 and 16
mm demo shot at the CBS Studio City, CA lot. Because of this, CBS
intends in the beginning to send two versions of each prime time show -
one in HDTV framed and shot for 16:9 aspect ratio and a 525 version in
4:3
aspect ratio down converted
from the HDTV but not letterboxed. They will then migrate for "HDTV
only" as stations come up to speed on the new standard. The government
will be putting a lot of pressure on the broadcaster so it can get those
old analog channels back and sell them off for MONEY! The government
will have to encourage the cable companies to go digital. If the
cable companies are not encouraged to digitize, ATV will not move as fast
as the FCC would like. The government wants to start phasing out
NTSC by 2006 with complete shut down of NTSC by 2015. This decision will
be reviewed every 2 years.
Afternoon Session
Several panel discussions
followed. The conclusion is that there are many unsolved questions
for the broadcaster, post-production and production communities, with a
few solutions but a whole magnitude of missing solutions at this time.
The unknown is "What are the TV set manufacturers going to come up with
and with what features?" Also "What are the computer industry giants
going to do?"
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speaking of SMPTE
Subj: SMPTE
Book
The "SMPTE Standards for
Advanced Television and High Definition Production with Supplemental Standards
Including Ancillary Data" is available. It was initially published
in 1996. It contains a series of 13 documents including:
Section 1: 1125/60 and
digital representation, 1920x1080 both 60 and 50 Hz, 720x483 active line
with digital representation, 1280x720 scanning and interface.
Section 2: (Supplemental)
Ancillary Data and Space Formatting, AES/EBU Audio & Auxiliary data,
10-bit 4:2:2 Component, and ITU 601-4 Encoding Parameters.
The Book is softbound,
188 pages 8 1/2 x 11. The price is $55 for SMPTE Members and $65
for Non-Members. The SMPTE p/n ISBN 0-940690-29-2.
Contact SMPTE at www.smpte.org
for more info and ordering information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subj: A few
personal observations
From: Larry
Bloomfield
Based on what I've seen
and heard so far in this fledgling part of our industry, it would certainly
make sense for someone with big bucks bent on getting a very good return
on their investment to invest in the wonderful world of telecine.
This would be a short term investment, however say for the next four to
five years. You may very well ask why when this has been a vanishing
part of most plants over the last several years. I'd even bet
that there are some young new comers to our industry that have never seen
a telecine island let alone know what it is, except for reading about it
in history books.
Here's what I'd do if
I knew anyone who ran a film library and I had those bucks I spoke of earlier:
I'd get a telecine machine or two that had the most bit rate scan and pixel
capacity available, make sure I had someone on my staff who knew
how to paint pictures, if I couldn't do it myself, and then contract to
transfer film. Notice I didn't say to what.
First let's look at why.
It makes sense that the tape libraries of film in NTSC will soon be as
obsolete as an image orthicon color camera. Someone will have to
transfer all those the film libraries out there in movieland. It doesn't
take a Chriswell to predict that those who can do a reasonably good job
of this will keep their equipment running 24 hours, 7 days a week and bring
in the big bucks.
The key is NOT to think
in terms of film to tape transfers but rather in terms of film to DATA
transfers. Step one - get the contract then get the film. Transfer
it at the highest scan rate your super telecine machine can handle.
Why? Well, when the time comes to play it back you can choose whatever
format or standard the client wants NTSC or PAL 4/3, HDTV 16/9 or
most anything else your client wants. Make sense? Sure does
to me. We do standards transfers every day when we get feeds from
Europe. The degradation takes place when we go from a lesser standard
to an improved or better
standard. The
garbage really shows up.
The ironic part of all
this is, Jim Mendrala and I put together, on paper, a full component telecine
facility that would do all this over a year and a half ago, but you know
where the industry was then.
What do you think about
all this? Your thoughts are welcome on this subject.
Larry
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subj: Speaking
of Telecine
There is a Telecine Interest
Group on the Web. If you are interested you can check it out at <http://www.alegria.com/telecinehome.html>.
You may subscribe by sending a message to "telecine-request@alegria.com"
with the Subject: subscribe. If you'd prefer to receive a digest
of the list every three days, send a message to telecine-digest-request@alegria.com"
with the Subject: subscribe. When you correspond with them they will
explain the various options and what might be best for you. As of
May, 1997, they have over 700 subscribers. They started with just
a handful in June 1994.
There are probably many
more readers of the group than subscribers, as the messages enjoy a wide
distribution, through forwarded e-mail and printouts. If you want to just
ask them questions, the address for the group itself is "telecine@alegria.com"
or call (213) 464-6266.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subj: Seminar in
Audio for ATV
Date: 97-05-22
TMH Corporation may hold
a future seminar on Audio for ATV. To indicate your interest in such
a seminar, please fax or mail your name, organization, and how to reach
you (mail, e-mail, fax, etc.). and your address for mail, e-mail, or fax,
to the following address:
TMH Corporation
3375 South Hoover St.
Suite J
Los Angeles, CA 90007
PHN: (213) 742-0030
FAX: (213-742-0040
www.tmhlabs.com
Tomlinson Holman (of THX
fame) is president of TMH Corporation. He was an observer member
of ATSC during the development of the ATV standard, and participated in
audio committees. He is a fellow of AES, BKSTS, and SMPTE.
Tom would conduct such
a proposed seminar in a day long session, probably on a Saturday .
(Ed note: Nothing
was mentioned about cost in the information we received
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We received another newsletter
via e-mail and thought some of you might be interested, especially in their
story in the most recent offering about.)
"CONGRESS CONSIDERING
DIGITAL VIDEO RESTRICTIONS DURING INTERNATIONAL TREATY PROCESS. It
was sent from: "Alan S. Kitey" on: Thursday, May 22, 1997.
The title of the publication is - HRRC (Home Recording Rights Coalition)
Insider:Electronic Edition. If you are interested, and since we do
not have their permission to reprint their efforts here, you can get it
at:
1-(800) 282-8273, <info@hrrc.org>
or visit their web site at <www.hrrc.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subj: Cintel Course
Since Jim and I have spoken
of telecine in the past and again in this issue, alluding to the importance
of its role as a program source, Jim passed on this information to me from
the Telecine Interest Group thinking some of you might be interested.
"Cintel International
Ltd is holding an URSA GOLD ONE WEEK COURSE from the 16-20 JUNE, 1997 IN
VALENClA - U.S.A.
"There are still several
places available if you would like to take up this opportunity .
"For further information
about this Course or to receive a Booking Form, please do not hesitate
to contact Linda Marrow or myself at Cintet on:
Tel: *44 1920 483939
Fax: +44 1920 484722
e-mail: 100566.855@compuserve.com
"Alternatively contact
Susann Walker at our American Office on:
Tel: +1 805 294 2310
Fax: +1 805 294 1019
"Best regards Clive Haward"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NWTN is published
for broadcast professionals who are interested in DTV, HDTV etc. by Larry
Bloomfield, Chief Engineer, KTVZ, Bend, Oregon and Jim Mendrala, Consulting
Engineer, Val Verde, California. We can be reached by either e-mail
or land line (541) 385-9115, (805) 294-1049 or fax at (805) 294-0705.
Thanks to the folks at ommunications General Corporation for inspiring
us to do this. News items are always welcome from our readers
letters may be edited for brevity.
larrybend@aol.com --------- J_Mendrala@compuserve.com
NWTN articles may be reproduced
in any form provided they are unaltered and credit is given to the North
West Technical Notes and the originating authors, when named.
END